McFadden ruled that the government infringed upon the AP’s FirstAmendment rights by denying it access to events on Feb. 11, after it refused to update its style guide to reflect Trump’s order that changed the name of the body of water bordering the southern
“As a matter of law, that post was protected by the FirstAmendment and falls outside the scope of 18 U.S.C. [Section] 871(a) and 18 U.S.C. [Section] 875(c). Both Counts must therefore be dismissed.”
One of her attorneys, CJ Grisham, who specializes in First and Second amendment cases, told The Epoch Times that it is a quintessential FirstAmendment case involving protected speech.
It contains no analysis, much less meaningful discussion of the important FirstAmendment issues raised in the case," Scott James Street told The Epoch Times in an email.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit blocked the state’s actions against me, determining that “Oregon’s policy violates the FirstAmendment.”
This is by no means a problem confined to Oregon.
In his first term, Trump signed an executive order directing the IRS to relax enforcement of the Johnson Amendment. He also vowed to repeal the Johnson Amendment, but never did.
A selective prosecution claim alleges a violation of equal protection principles when the government charges a person based on protected characteristics such as race, religion, or the exercise of FirstAmendment rights.
The lawsuit says the Colorado law violates the FirstAmendment.
Weiser didn’t respond to an email seeking comment.
The lawsuit questions the use of the term “algorithmic discrimination” in the law, calling it vague.
NetChoice argues the state law violates FirstAmendment free speech protections.
Nine platforms that belong to the trade association had been shielded by the district court’s now-suspended ruling.
However, evidence shows that the department is punishing Anthropic for “criticizing the government’s contracting position in the press,” which constitutes “classic illegal FirstAmendment retaliation,” she said.
Writing for the majority in the three-judge panel’s decision in May 2025, Judge Robin Rosenbaum said the act “wields a shotgun when the FirstAmendment allows a scalpel at most.”
Clayton responded by saying his office followed its protocols and maintaining that he is committed to defending the FirstAmendment and the role of the press.
The university said in a March 31 statement that handing over lists of Jewish faculty and staff, along with their personal contact details, to the commission would pose “serious privacy and FirstAmendment concerns.”
“Subpoenas are not the first thing you do; they are the last thing you do,” the judge said, citing protections in the FirstAmendment and accusing the government of turning the law “on its head.”
A federal judge dismissed the case in March, ruling that the districts failed to show that the school officials' actions, carried out in their official capacity, qualify for FirstAmendment protection.
Constitution’s FirstAmendment.
In December 2025, Customs and Border Protection proposed a new rule requiring some tourists to provide access to their social media history for the past five years before entering the country.