Reges said that after 39 years of teaching, his fight for free speech almost cost him his “dream job.”

And if platforms fail to comply, they face exorbitant fines, thus providing clear incentives to censor and none to promote free speech.

Since students accept that the instruction and materials they are seeking constitute government speech, this is fatal to their case, as the government’s own speech “is not restricted by the Free Speech Clause.”

Free speech is a birthright that you gave us, and you guys decided not to codify it, and now it's poof, it's basically gone.

"The EU should be supporting free speech, not attacking American companies over garbage."

Speech Supporting Assassination Has Consequences Following Kirk’s killing, some individuals openly celebrated online or in the workplace—sparking widespread debate about free speech.

Ultimately, it may have to be left up to a court to decide if section 48 is a violation of free speech, the senior fellow said.

Hamburger Mary’s lawyer said a Supreme Court review is needed to protect her client’s free speech.

PEN America, a nonprofit that advocates for free speech, said in a legal brief that the Iowa law "is part of a troubling national trend of educational censorship and has already caused substantial harm."

Free speech has become a dark topic in Britain and, absurdly, a stance on which indicates where on the political spectrum you sit. 

ASU ranks 23rd in FIRE’s Free Speech Rankings, with a score of 70 and a grade of C- for its speech climate.

Jay Bhattacharya for being champions of free speech and independent thought during the COVID-19 period.

Officials have said the EU's laws and regulations restrict free speech.

Jordan, shared on X by academic Michael Shellenberger, claims the eSafety Commissioner is a threat to free speech.

“An academic institution is a place where you can explore ideas, you can have free speech.” “So University of Lethbridge, this is what you’ve done, you have failed...,” she added.

This goes beyond protected free speech—it is the equivalent of shouting "fire" in a crowded theater.

Those rules, the complaint contends, have a chilling effect on free speech for YAF student members “expressing their opinions on gender identity and transgender issues both on and off campus.” ​

Including from just last week about widespread disastrous resistance to systematic thought in Canada, from free speech to free trade, unleashing bad policy from muddled theory. Maybe Sean Feucht could sing about it… but not in Canada.

The episode has widened into a cultural flashpoint and fueled debate over free speech.

The case involved the Free Speech Union (FSU) of Australia and a December 2024 interview with Inman Grant published on the Council of Foreign Relations website.

Critics say the law harms democracy and free speech, but authorities say the move is aimed at protecting minors from online predators and extortion.

Free speech is still our best tool with which to combat bigotry."

Constitution’s free-speech protections. U.S. District Judge David Hittner in Houston declared Texas Senate Bill 12 an unconstitutional restriction on speech. He permanently enjoined Attorney General Ken Paxton from enforcing it.

other critics say stifles free speech and imposes costs on U.S. tech ‌companies.

Uphold free speech. The attacker must be brought to justice,” she added. Fellow Conservative MP Andrew Lawton described the shooting as an assault against free speech.

Reiners talks about the Public Order Act and how it’s being used to prosecute people for offensive social media posts, creating a chilling effect on free speech.

Privacy and free speech advocates, such as UK-based Open Rights Group, say that a social media ban for under-16s would be an ineffective response to online harms.

The Free Speech Union wrote on X that it is suing the Metropolitan Police for what it said was Linehan’s “wrongful arrest and false imprisonment, as well as breaches of his free speech rights."

We talk to Colin Wright, a lifelong Democrat, who now writes about free speech.

Miller’s defense was that she was exercising her rights to free speech and free exercise of religion, as protected by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.